1
ACHIEVEMENT DESCRIPTORS Assessment 2: Annotated Bibliography | |||||||||
CRITERIA (and value as % of overall mark) | Outstanding | High Distinction | Distinction | Credit | Pass | Basic Pass | Fail | Major Fail | Null |
95 – 100% | 85 – 94% | 75 – 84% | 65 – 74% | 60 – 64% | 50 – 59% | 40 – 49% | 20 – 39% | 0 – 19% | |
Identifies appropriate legal research tool – most appropriate tool for a given research purpose. 10% | The work demonstrates outstanding knowledge of and use of the relevant legal research tools. | The work demonstrates excellent knowledge of and use of the relevant legal research tools. | The work demonstrates advanced knowledge of and use of the relevant legal research tools. | The work demonstrates solid competence in its knowledge of and use of the relevant legal research tools | The work demonstrates basic level competence in its knowledge of and use of the relevant legal research tools. | The work demonstrates a basic familiarity in its knowledge of and use of the relevant legal research tools. | The work somehow demonstrates a basic familiarity with the relevant research tools, but that familiarity is unclear. | The work does not demonstrate even a basic familiarity with the relevant legal research tools, or that familiarity is very unclear. | The Proposal does not demonstrate any familiarity with the relevant legal research tools. |
Locates relevant primary sources of law – using a number of different approaches locates relevant law (in both its adjudicative and statutory modes) 20% | Using a number of different approaches the work locates relevant case law and statutory law to an outstanding level. | Using a number of different approaches the work locates relevant case law and statutory law to an excellent level. | Using a number of different approaches the work locates relevant case law and statutory law to an advanced level. | Using a number of different approaches the work locates relevant case law and statutory law to a solidly competent level. | The work demonstrates basic level competence in using a number of different approaches to locate relevant case law and statutory law. | The work demonstrates basic familiarity with using a number of different approaches to locate relevant case law and statutory law. | The work somehow demonstrates basic familiarity with using a number of different approaches to locate relevant case law and/or statutory law, but that familiarity is unclear. | The work does not demonstrate even a basic familiarity with using a number of different approaches to locate relevant case law and/or statutory law, or that familiarity is very unclear. | The work does not demonstrate any familiarity with using a number of different approaches to locate relevant case law and/or statutory law. |
2
Currency of primary sources – sources most recent primary sources of law 10% | The currency of the primary sources of law sourced in the work is flawless. | The currency of the primary sources of law sourced in the work is achieved to an excellent level. | The currency of the primary sources of law sourced in the work is achieved to an advanced level. | The currency of the primary sources of law sourced in the work is achieved to a solidly competent level. | The work achieves a basic level competence in sourcing current primary sources of law. | The work achieves a basic level of sourcing current primary sources of law. | The work somehow achieves a basic level of sourcing current primary sources of law, but this work is unclear. | The work does not achieve even a basic level of sourcing current primary sources of law, or that sourcing is very unclear. | The work does not source any current primary sources of law. |
Locates relevant secondary sources of law – eg: journal articles, textbooks, case notes, statute notes, EM, SR Speeches & other secondary sources – to assist in interpretation of primary sources 20% | Using a number of different approaches the work locates relevant secondary sources of law to an outstanding level. | Using a number of different approaches the work locates relevant secondary sources of law to an excellent level. | Using a number of different approaches the work locates relevant secondary sources of law to an advanced level. | Using a number of different approaches the work locates relevant secondary sources of law to a solidly competent level. | The work demonstrates basic level competence in using a number of different approaches to locate relevant secondary sources of law. | The work demonstrates basic familiarity with using a number of different approaches to locate relevant secondary sources of law. | The work somehow demonstrates basic familiarity with using a number of different approaches to locate relevant secondary sources of law, but that familiarity is unclear. | The work does not demonstrate even a basic familiarity with using a number of different approaches to locate relevant secondary sources of law, or that familiarity is very unclear. | The work does not demonstrate any familiarity with using a number of different approaches to locate relevant secondary sources of law. |
3
Application of law to facts – applies relevant primary law to material facts 10% | Outstanding application of relevant law to legally material facts to suggest a credible potential legal outcome. | Excellent application of relevant law to legally material facts to suggest a credible potential legal outcome. | Advanced application of relevant law to legally material facts to suggest a credible potential legal outcome. | Solidly competent application of relevant law to legally material facts to suggest a credible potential legal outcome. | The work demonstrates basic competence in the application of relevant law to legally material facts to suggest a credible potential legal outcome. | The work demonstrates basic familiarity with the process of the application of relevant law to legally material facts to suggest a credible potential legal outcome. | The work somehow demonstrates basic application of relevant law to legally material facts to suggest a credible potential legal outcome, but that application is unclear. | The work does not demonstrate even basic application of relevant law to legally material facts to suggest a credible potential legal outcome, or that application is very unclear. | The work does not demonstrate application of relevant law to legally material facts to suggest a credible potential legal outcome. |
Knowledge of the formal institutions and processes which shape the development of Australian law 10% | Outstanding familiarity with the formal institutions and processes which shape the development of Australian law. | Excellent familiarity with the formal institutions and processes which shape the development of Australian law. | Advanced familiarity with the formal institutions and processes which shape the development of Australian law. | Solidly competent familiarity with the formal institutions and processes which shape the development of Australian law. | Basic competence in level of familiarity with the formal institutions and processes which shape the development of Australian law. | Basic familiarity with the formal institutions and processes which shape the development of Australian law. | The work somehow demonstrates a basic level of familiarity with the formal institutions and processes which shape the development of Australian law, or that familiarity is unclear. | The work does not demonstrate even a basic level of familiarity with the formal institutions and processes which shape the development of Australian law, or that familiarity is very unclear. | The work does not demonstrate any familiarity with the formal institutions and processes which shape the development of Australian law. |
4
Integrated analysis – integrates the relevance of both (i) the elements of the processes of judicial law-making and (ii) the elements and structures of the legislative function of Australia’s parliaments 10% | Outstanding integration of the relevance of both the elements of the processes of judicial law-making and the elements and structures of the legislative function of Australia’s parliaments. | Excellent integration of the relevance of both the elements of the processes of judicial law-making and the elements and structures of the legislative function of Australia’s parliaments. | Advanced integration of the relevance of both the elements of the processes of judicial law-making and the elements and structures of the legislative function of Australia’s parliaments. | Solidly competent integration of the relevance of both the elements of the processes of judicial law-making and the elements and structures of the legislative function of Australia’s parliaments. | Basic competence in the integration of the relevance of both the elements of the processes of judicial law-making and the elements and structures of the legislative function of Australia’s parliaments. | Basic level integration of the relevance of both the elements of the processes of judicial law-making and the elements and structures of the legislative function of Australia’s parliaments. | The work somehow demonstrates basic level integration of the relevance of both the elements of the processes of judicial law-making and the elements and structures of the legislative function of Australia’s parliaments, or that application is unclear. | The work does not demonstrate even basic level integration of the relevance of both the elements of the processes of judicial law-making and the elements and structures of the legislative function of Australia’s parliaments, or that application is very unclear. | The work does not demonstrate any integration of the relevance of both the elements of the processes of judicial law-making and the elements and structures of the legislative function of Australia’s parliaments. |
Referencing – accords with AGLC, including for footnotes (when used) and includes a Bibliography (to list all materials which guided or influenced the work in the assignment) 10% | All referencing and related formatting requirements are met. The citation and referencing are flawless. | Only very few minor errors are present in the referencing and related formatting requirements. The citation and referencing contain only very few minor errors. | Only a few errors are present in the referencing and related formatting requirements. The citation and referencing contain only a few errors. | Some errors are present in the referencing and related formatting requirements. The citation and referencing contain some errors. | A number of errors are present in the referencing and related formatting requirements. The citation and referencing contain a number of errors. | A good number of errors are present in the referencing and related formatting requirements. The citation and referencing contain a good number of errors. | A significant number of errors are present in the referencing and related formatting requirements. The citation & referencing contain a significant number of errors. | The Proposal is replete with referencing and related formatting errors. The citation and referencing are replete with errors. | The Proposal does not comply with the referencing and related formatting requirements. The Proposal does not comply with citation and referencing requirements. |