Clearly, diagnosis is a critical aspect of healthcare. However, the ultimate purpose of a diagnosis is the development and application of a series of treatments or protocols. Isolated recognition of a health issue does little to resolve it.
AssignmentTutorOnlineIn this module’s Discussion, you applied the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory to diagnose potential problems with the civility of your organization. In this Assignment, you will continue to analyze the results and apply published research to the development of a proposed treatment for any issues uncovered by the assessment.
To Prepare:
· Review your Work Environment Assessment Template.
——Copy of my Template attached under files
· Reflect on your Discussion post regarding your evaluation of workplace civility and the feedback received from colleagues.
—–Main Discussion posting is attached as files
· Select and review one of the following articles found in the Resources:
o Clark, Olender, Cardoni, and Kenski (2011)
o Clark (2018)
o Griffin and Clark (2014)
The Assignment (3-6 pages total):
Part 1: Work Environment Assessment (1-2 pages)
· Review the Work Environment Assessment Template you completed for this Module’s Discussion.
· Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace.
· Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed.
· Explain what the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace.
Part 2: Reviewing the Literature (1-2 pages)
· Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article you selected.
· Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.
· Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.
Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams (1–2 pages)
· Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
· Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
Main Discussion Posting
The Work Environment Assessment is an “evidence-based tool to raise awareness, assess the perceived health of an organization, and determine strengths and areas for improvement” (Clark, 2015, p. 19). After completing the assessment tool, my current workplace scored a 68 which places our work environment in the “barely healthy” category. For example, one statement on the assessment asks if there is a clear level of trust between formal leadership and staff in the workplace. I rated this completely untrue. There are many nurses in our clinic that don’t feel like they can trust our nursing supervisor. He will tell you what you want to hear to your face and do the complete opposite just to get you out of his office. He will also talk to one nurse about another nurse negatively. This is not a good example of a leader. This is why I believe that my workplace is not civil because of our poor leadership. The common theme is that leadership is addressed with issues and then nothing happens. According to Marshall and Broome, “doing nothing and not making decisions when one is in a position of responsibility is simply unconscionable” (2017, p. 139).
Incivility can be defined as “a low-intensity behavior, or uncivil behavior, with the intent to harm the target” (Kisner, 2018, p. 36). Here is an example of incivility between a nurse, fellow collegeaus, and leadership. This is a Department of Defense facility so there are always formal leaders, providers, and nurses coming and going. Almost everyone in the facility is directly linked to the military system. When I first started working here, the clinic was developing a new team or clinic for the 65 and older community. My preceptor and several others were being moved to the new team due to colleagues not being civil to each other. My preceptor took me with her to the new team, stating that based on my personality it would be better for me. Our team worked so incredibly well together. Everyone knew what their duties and responsibilities were every day. Our team was growing in patients, providers, and nurses. A new RN was added to our team and conflict immediately started. She came in on the first day acting like she was above everyone else. In orientation, she would always say well where I came from we did it like this and her preceptor would always with that is okay, but this is how we do it here. There were several conflicts and arguments between providers, nurses, and formal leaders with this nurse which lead to conflict between our team. She would pull up provider’s notes and critique them, tell them what they were doing wrong, and take it to our chief nursing officer. She would also take pictures with her phone about other nurse’s work and state that she was going to save them for when she needed them. At one point, she called our chief nursing officer incompetent and our Chief Department Officer a curse word to their face. Nothing happened to this nurse and leadership overlooked this situation. There were several comments made among staff that it must be okay to call your supervisor profound words because nothing will happen to you. Our work environment went from civil to not civil over the short three months that this nurse was there. “Lack of action frustrates others who are looking to you to decide so that they can move on and implement plans aligned with that decision” (Marshall & Broom, 2017, p. 139).
When issues develop, mediation has been a key component to resolve the issue at a lower level. “Mediation is described by scholars as a facilitated process designed to resolve conflict between two parties in a voluntary and mutually acceptable way through neutral third-party assistance as an alternative to proceedings that are more coercive” (Knickle, McNaughton, and Downar, 2012, p. 1). In this situation there were several levels of mediations that started at the lower level first (person to person), then lead RN to individual, then as a team, and then to our chief nursing officer. This issue went all the way to our chief of department officer, because our chief nursing officer didn’t do anything to help solve the issue. For example, this new nurse requested many times to change teams because personalities were clashing and she stated that she was being bullied. Our supervisor would continue to say that conflicts needed to be addressed within the team. This clinic is huge and there was a need for this individual on several teams. Eventually, this nurse found another job and left.